Key takeaways
- A step-by-step internal linking strategy for SEO: how to build topic clusters (pillar → hub → supporting), choose anchor text, avoid crawl debt, and validate results in Google Search Console
Table of Contents
Internal links are not navigation. They are instructions: what matters, what supports it, and how topics relate. On a young site, internal linking is often the fastest way to improve discovery + indexing priority.
If you’re debugging indexing first, start here:
TL;DR
- Build clusters, not isolated posts: 1 pillar + 6–12 supporting pages with distinct intent.
- Make the cluster visible with a hub page (topic hub / “start here” block).
- Link both directions: pillar → supporting and supporting → hub/pillar.
- Use anchors that encode intent (“Crawled – currently not indexed: fixes”), not “click here”.
- Add a small Next steps block (3 links) to keep users (and crawlers) moving.
- Validate with GSC: impressions rise across the cluster, not only one URL.
The model: pillar → hub → supporting → back-links
Use a simple architecture:
- Pillar: the map (broad intent, long shelf-life)
- Hub: the curated index of the cluster (e.g.
/topics/seo) - Supporting pages: each page solves one intent
- Back-links: supporting pages link back to the pillar (and to adjacent supporting pages when truly relevant)
This creates coverage + coherence: systems can interpret the set as a topic, not as random documents.
Start with the SEO hub:
Step 0: choose core URLs (so Google knows what to prioritize)
Pick:
- 1 pillar page (or the closest thing you have)
- 5–10 supporting pages you want indexed and ranking
- 3–5 strong internal sources (homepage, hub pages, top posts)
You will use those strong sources to “push” discovery and priority to the cluster.
Step 1: eliminate orphans (fastest indexing win)
An orphan page has no meaningful internal links pointing to it (sometimes only a sitemap link).
Checklist:
- every new supporting post is linked from at least 2 strong pages
- it is linked from one hub (topic / cluster index)
- it links back to the pillar
If you’re stuck in “not indexed” statuses, internal links often help when the issue is priority/coherence:
Step 2: anchor text rules (so links mean something)
Bad internal linking creates noise.
Rules:
- Name the intent: “technical SEO audit checklist”, not “learn more”
- Be consistent: don’t link to the same page with 10 unrelated anchors
- Avoid over-optimization: mix exact + partial + descriptive anchors naturally
- Prefer contextual links over footer-only links for priority signals
Step 3: add “start here” + “next steps” blocks
Hub: “start here” block
On the hub, include:
- 1–2 sentences framing who it’s for
- 3–7 links in recommended order
Supporting posts: “next steps” block
At the bottom of each supporting post, keep it small (3 links):
- Back to hub (
/topics/seo) - Best next supporting post (adjacent intent)
- Pillar (main guide)
Step 4: prevent crawl debt (internal linking can create junk)
Internal linking improves discovery, but it can also multiply low-value URLs. Watch for:
- thin tag pages
- pagination as crawl sinks
- parameter URLs getting linked internally (
?utm=...)
If you recently pivoted, clean up old URLs instead of linking to everything:
Step 5: validate in GSC (don’t guess)
Internal linking should change priority first, then impressions.
In Google Search Console:
- URL Inspection (for 5–10 core URLs): indexing allowed + consistent canonical
- Pages report: core URLs should move from “Discovered/Crawled” to indexed
- Performance: impressions should cluster around the topic (not random one-offs)
If you’re seeing impressions but no clicks, linking helps distribution, but you may need snippet/intent work too:
FAQ
How many internal links should a blog post have?
Enough to express relationships, not to “sculpt”. For most posts: 3–8 contextual links (plus navigation) is a good baseline.
Do internal links help indexing?
Yes. Internal links affect discovery and priority. Orphan and weakly linked pages are much more likely to stay “discovered/crawled but not indexed”.
What’s the biggest internal linking mistake?
Linking randomly or only in footers/sidebars. The system needs a clear hierarchy: pillar ↔ supporting, with hubs making the cluster visible.
Next in SEO & Search
Up next:
Technical SEO audit checklist (2026): The high-leverage steps that actually move rankingsA practical technical SEO audit checklist: what to check first, how to prioritize fixes, and how to validate results in Google Search Console.