3.675 min read

How to build topic clusters with internal linking (2026): a practical blueprint that gets pages indexed

By Official

Key takeaways

  • A step-by-step internal linking strategy for SEO: how to build topic clusters (pillar → hub → supporting), choose anchor text, avoid crawl debt, and validate results in Google Search Console

Internal links are not navigation. They are instructions: what matters, what supports it, and how topics relate. On a young site, internal linking is often the fastest way to improve discovery + indexing priority.

If you’re debugging indexing first, start here:

TL;DR

  • Build clusters, not isolated posts: 1 pillar + 6–12 supporting pages with distinct intent.
  • Make the cluster visible with a hub page (topic hub / “start here” block).
  • Link both directions: pillar → supporting and supporting → hub/pillar.
  • Use anchors that encode intent (“Crawled – currently not indexed: fixes”), not “click here”.
  • Add a small Next steps block (3 links) to keep users (and crawlers) moving.
  • Validate with GSC: impressions rise across the cluster, not only one URL.

Use a simple architecture:

  • Pillar: the map (broad intent, long shelf-life)
  • Hub: the curated index of the cluster (e.g. /topics/seo)
  • Supporting pages: each page solves one intent
  • Back-links: supporting pages link back to the pillar (and to adjacent supporting pages when truly relevant)

This creates coverage + coherence: systems can interpret the set as a topic, not as random documents.

Start with the SEO hub:

Step 0: choose core URLs (so Google knows what to prioritize)

Pick:

  • 1 pillar page (or the closest thing you have)
  • 5–10 supporting pages you want indexed and ranking
  • 3–5 strong internal sources (homepage, hub pages, top posts)

You will use those strong sources to “push” discovery and priority to the cluster.

Step 1: eliminate orphans (fastest indexing win)

An orphan page has no meaningful internal links pointing to it (sometimes only a sitemap link).

Checklist:

  • every new supporting post is linked from at least 2 strong pages
  • it is linked from one hub (topic / cluster index)
  • it links back to the pillar

If you’re stuck in “not indexed” statuses, internal links often help when the issue is priority/coherence:

Bad internal linking creates noise.

Rules:

  • Name the intent: “technical SEO audit checklist”, not “learn more”
  • Be consistent: don’t link to the same page with 10 unrelated anchors
  • Avoid over-optimization: mix exact + partial + descriptive anchors naturally
  • Prefer contextual links over footer-only links for priority signals

Step 3: add “start here” + “next steps” blocks

Hub: “start here” block

On the hub, include:

  • 1–2 sentences framing who it’s for
  • 3–7 links in recommended order

Supporting posts: “next steps” block

At the bottom of each supporting post, keep it small (3 links):

  • Back to hub (/topics/seo)
  • Best next supporting post (adjacent intent)
  • Pillar (main guide)

Step 4: prevent crawl debt (internal linking can create junk)

Internal linking improves discovery, but it can also multiply low-value URLs. Watch for:

  • thin tag pages
  • pagination as crawl sinks
  • parameter URLs getting linked internally (?utm=...)

If you recently pivoted, clean up old URLs instead of linking to everything:

Step 5: validate in GSC (don’t guess)

Internal linking should change priority first, then impressions.

In Google Search Console:

  1. URL Inspection (for 5–10 core URLs): indexing allowed + consistent canonical
  2. Pages report: core URLs should move from “Discovered/Crawled” to indexed
  3. Performance: impressions should cluster around the topic (not random one-offs)

If you’re seeing impressions but no clicks, linking helps distribution, but you may need snippet/intent work too:

FAQ

How many internal links should a blog post have?

Enough to express relationships, not to “sculpt”. For most posts: 3–8 contextual links (plus navigation) is a good baseline.

Yes. Internal links affect discovery and priority. Orphan and weakly linked pages are much more likely to stay “discovered/crawled but not indexed”.

What’s the biggest internal linking mistake?

Linking randomly or only in footers/sidebars. The system needs a clear hierarchy: pillar ↔ supporting, with hubs making the cluster visible.

Next in SEO & Search

View topic hub

Up next:

Technical SEO audit checklist (2026): The high-leverage steps that actually move rankings

A practical technical SEO audit checklist: what to check first, how to prioritize fixes, and how to validate results in Google Search Console.